From: Krucker, Louis (louis.krucker@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 02:36:11 GMT-3
Hi Group
What about this
source-bridge ring-group 400
dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 prom
dlsw bridge-group 2
int to0/0
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
ring-speed 16
source-bridge 1 2 400
int e0/0
ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0
bridge-group 2
bridge 2 prot ieee
Lets say the ibm mainframe is on the tokenring, if the client is on
the ethernet, does the bridge number of ethernet and token ring have to
be the same number ?
cheers
Louis
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe A [mailto:GroupStudy@comcast.net]
Sent: Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2002 06:29
To: 'jinqiang yu'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: dlsw bridge-group # and Cat5k vlan id
There is no relation
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
jinqiang yu
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:06 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: dlsw bridge-group # and Cat5k vlan id
hi guys,
I am confusing about the the relaction between dlsw
bridge-group number and Cat5k vlan id. For example,the
topo like this,R2(E0)----Cat5K(2/1).2/1 of Cat5K is in
vlan 10.Can the dlsw bridge# be 10 or must be 10?
Thanks a lot.
yujq
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:41 GMT-3