From: Justin Cook (Justin.Cook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 21:46:01 GMT-3
The only way to do it with different dlcis is to use the Frame Relay Switch
(which is just a router with 2 serial interfaces) as your need a device to
map the layer 2 DLCIs together
It is reasonably easy to do and only requires about 3 or 4 lines but you do
require another router with 2 serial links and 2 sets of DTE/DCE cables
Cheers
-- Justin Cook-----Original Message----- From: Armand D [mailto:ciscoworks2001@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, 24 July 2002 9:27 a.m. To: \mit_A~kan_ Cc: Ccie (E-mail) Subject: RE: Frame Relay NO Sub-interfaces
Hi,
My questoin says to use the DLCIs provided (101 and 102). It also asks me to configure without frame-relay interface-dlci command.
Will this be possible if DLCIs don't match ?
thanks,
Armand
--- \mit_A~kan_(TK-Network_Gvz|mleri) <umit.askan@probil.com.tr> wrote: > > at the dce side : > > frame-relay switching > int s0 > frame-relay intf-type dce > > and your dlci mappings must match, use 101 or 102 at > both sides. > > hope this helps > umit > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Armand D [mailto:ciscoworks2001@yahoo.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 23:01 > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com > Subject: Frame Relay NO Sub-interfaces > > > Hello, > > I'm wondering if anyone has a sample config for a > Frame Relay back to back using no subinterfaces. I > have the following configurations on my routers. > Both > routers show interface status UP DOWN and PVC status > inactive. > > > DTE Side: > > Interface s0 > encap frame-relay > ip add 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 > frame-Relay map ip 10.0.0.2 101 broadcast > frame-relay lmi-type cisco > > DCE Side: > Ineterface s0 > encap frame-relay > ip add 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0 > Frame-Relay map ip 10.0.0.1 102 broadcast > clock rate 128000 > frame-relay lmi-type cisco > > > Any tips would be great. > > Thanks, > > Armand > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:41 GMT-3