Re: Frame Relay NO Sub-interfaces

From: CC (ccie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:40:27 GMT-3


   
Apparently you can use 2 DLCI's back to back without a Frame Switch. Umit
posted these configs earlier (Thanks Umit!). Each DLCI provides a one-way
communication path between the routers. All traffic from the DTE side
heading to 10.0.0.2 takes DLCI 101 while all traffic from the DCE side takes
DLCI 102.

>>------------------->>>DLCI 101>>>------------------>>
DTE
DCE
        <<-------------------<<<DLCI 102<<<------------------<<

DTE Side:

 Interface s0
 encap frame-relay
 ip add 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
 frame-Relay map ip 10.0.0.2 101 broadcast
 no keepalive
 frame-relay interface-dlci 102

DCE Side:

 Ineterface s0
 encap frame-relay
 ip add 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
 Frame-Relay map ip 10.0.0.1 102 broadcast
 clock rate 128000
 no keepalive
 frame-relay interface-dlci 101

----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Cook" <Justin.Cook@computerland.co.nz>
To: "'Armand D'" <ciscoworks2001@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Ccie (E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:46 PM
Subject: RE: Frame Relay NO Sub-interfaces

> The only way to do it with different dlcis is to use the Frame Relay
Switch
> (which is just a router with 2 serial interfaces) as your need a device to
> map the layer 2 DLCIs together
>
> It is reasonably easy to do and only requires about 3 or 4 lines but you
do
> require another router with 2 serial links and 2 sets of DTE/DCE cables
>
> Cheers
>
>
> --
> Justin Cook
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Armand D [mailto:ciscoworks2001@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 July 2002 9:27 a.m.
> To: \mit_A~kan_
> Cc: Ccie (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Frame Relay NO Sub-interfaces
>
> Hi,
>
> My questoin says to use the DLCIs provided (101 and
> 102). It also asks me to configure without frame-relay
> interface-dlci command.
>
> Will this be possible if DLCIs don't match ?
>
> thanks,
>
> Armand
>
> --- \mit_A~kan_(TK-Network_Gvz|mleri)
> <umit.askan@probil.com.tr> wrote:
> >
> > at the dce side :
> >
> > frame-relay switching
> > int s0
> > frame-relay intf-type dce
> >
> > and your dlci mappings must match, use 101 or 102 at
> > both sides.
> >
> > hope this helps
> > umit
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Armand D [mailto:ciscoworks2001@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 23:01
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Frame Relay NO Sub-interfaces
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm wondering if anyone has a sample config for a
> > Frame Relay back to back using no subinterfaces. I
> > have the following configurations on my routers.
> > Both
> > routers show interface status UP DOWN and PVC status
> > inactive.
> >
> >
> > DTE Side:
> >
> > Interface s0
> > encap frame-relay
> > ip add 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> > frame-Relay map ip 10.0.0.2 101 broadcast
> > frame-relay lmi-type cisco
> >
> > DCE Side:
> > Ineterface s0
> > encap frame-relay
> > ip add 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
> > Frame-Relay map ip 10.0.0.1 102 broadcast
> > clock rate 128000
> > frame-relay lmi-type cisco
> >
> >
> > Any tips would be great.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Armand
> >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:41 GMT-3