From: Krucker, Louis (louis.krucker@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 20 2002 - 03:02:30 GMT-3
Hi
Yes i know but its also working with 2 static routes on the
cat pointing to each ethernet port.If one port goes down, the
cat change his gw to the other port.
Am i allowed to use hsrp if its not mentioned in the question ?
cheers
Louis
-----Original Message-----
From: Hansang Bae
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 20.07.2002 06:36
Subject: Re: 2 static routes or HSRP
At 11:20 PM 7/19/2002 +0200, Krucker, Louis wrote:
>I ran in a interesting issue today and whant ask you which is
>the better solution.
>Heres the scenarion.
>
>cat5k - | _
> _ |---|_|-----
> |_| - | R1 Internet Backbone
> | _
> |---|_|-----
> R2
>
>Lets say my cat must be reachable via the ethernet link, R1 and R2s
links
>pointing to the BB. For connectivity i have to put 2 static default
routes
>on the cat pointing to the ethernet ports to make sure if one port goes
down
>the cat is still reachable. There is a working solution also with HSRP.
My
>question now which solution scales more ?
>any comments are welcome....
I don't understand? Why would you *not* use HSRP? You can use the HSRP
address as the GW for the switch.
hsb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:37 GMT-3