From: Nate vanMaren (nate@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jul 18 2002 - 22:17:24 GMT-3
It keeps it in memory, but not flash. So if the router reloads and you do not
have the dhcp
database saved off, it will start from the beginning of the pool again. The Ci
sco dhcp server does
do ping tests, but I believe it removes addresses from the pool that respond to
a ping, so you could
quickly loose address space.
-Nate, CCIE #7911
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Pace" <anthonypace@fastmail.fm>
To: "Nate Van Maren" <nate@sisna.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:10 PM
Subject: Storing DHCP database on an FTP server
> This is another DHCP question:
>
> CCO always shows an external FTP server to store the DHCP database. Is
> this needed? Can't the router keep this table in memory? Is this just
> an optional thing?
>
> Anthony Pace
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:57:49 -0600, "Nate Van Maren" <nate@sisna.com>
> said:
> > Create some sort of super scope, that the dhcp server knows that the
> > two networks are actually one
> > physical segment and either can be used.
> > -Nate, CCIE #7911
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Wright, Jeremy" <JA_WRIGHT@admworld.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:48 AM
> > Subject: DHCP and Secondary Interfaces
> >
> >
> > > I have 1.1.1.1/24 as a primary interface and 2.2.2.2/24 as a secondary
> > > interface. If I point DHCP requests to 3.3.3.3 and the 1.1.1.1/24 scope i
s
> > > full, the DHCP server I'm assuming will respond back that it cannot proce
ss
> > > the request...will the secondary interface then source a DHCP request? TI
A
> > > team.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ************************
> > > Jeremy Wright
> > > Network Analyst
> > > Archer Daniels Midland
> > > ja_wright@admworld.com
> > > (217)451-4063
> > >
> > > ************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:36 GMT-3