From: Anthony Pace (anthonypace@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jul 18 2002 - 22:10:51 GMT-3
This is another DHCP question:
CCO always shows an external FTP server to store the DHCP database. Is
this needed? Can't the router keep this table in memory? Is this just
an optional thing?
Anthony Pace
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:57:49 -0600, "Nate Van Maren" <nate@sisna.com>
said:
> Create some sort of super scope, that the dhcp server knows that the
> two networks are actually one
> physical segment and either can be used.
> -Nate, CCIE #7911
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wright, Jeremy" <JA_WRIGHT@admworld.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:48 AM
> Subject: DHCP and Secondary Interfaces
>
>
> > I have 1.1.1.1/24 as a primary interface and 2.2.2.2/24 as a secondary
> > interface. If I point DHCP requests to 3.3.3.3 and the 1.1.1.1/24 scope is
> > full, the DHCP server I'm assuming will respond back that it cannot process
> > the request...will the secondary interface then source a DHCP request? TIA
> > team.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ************************
> > Jeremy Wright
> > Network Analyst
> > Archer Daniels Midland
> > ja_wright@admworld.com
> > (217)451-4063
> >
> > ************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:36 GMT-3