From: Brian McGahan (brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 15:36:48 GMT-3
Beda,
It all depends on what the requirements of the scenario are,
such as redundancy, optimal routing, etc. There's nothing wrong with
having multiple points of mutual redistribution, as long as you filter
your routes properly to prevent loops.
HTH
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
Director of Design and Implementation
brian@cyscoexpert.com
CyscoExpert Corporation
Internetwork Consulting & Training
http://www.cyscoexpert.com
Voice: 847.674.3392
Fax: 847.674.2625
-----Original Message-----
From: beda jain [mailto:bpjain@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Brian McGahan; 'beda jain'; 'Brian McGahan'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE:
Hi,
In r2 and r3 both igrp and ospf are running.
so i want to redistribute ospf to igrp to pass ospf router to r1 and
vise
versa.
So i can do this by doing mutual redistribution in r2 or r3 not both.
I real lab i have to do mutual redistribution in both r2 and r3 or not.
Thanks,
Beda
At 12:39 PM 7/17/2002 -0500, Brian McGahan wrote:
>Beda,
>
> Could you please try to clarify your question some more? I'm
>not really sure what you're asking.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>Director of Design and Implementation
>brian@cyscoexpert.com
>
>CyscoExpert Corporation
>Internetwork Consulting & Training
>http://www.cyscoexpert.com
>Voice: 847.674.3392
>Fax: 847.674.2625
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>beda jain
>Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:59 AM
>To: Brian McGahan
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject:
>
>Hi Brian,
>
> r1
> |
>r5-r2------|--------r3--------r4
>
>there are three link. r1 and r2, r1 and r3 and r2 and r3 .
>
>
>r1, r2 and r3 are running igrp,
>
>r2 ,r3 ,r4 and r5 are running ospf
>
>do we need to do mutual redistribute in r2 and r3 or only r2 or r3 will
>be ok.
>
>Thanks,
>Beda
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:34 GMT-3