From: Joseph Kimmer (jkimmer@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 16 2002 - 09:57:35 GMT-3
use passive on interfaces with unicast neighbor statements...
At 02:22 PM 7/16/2002 +0200, Luis Miguel Gil wrote:
>hi all,
> I am triying to establish a neighbor relationship between three RIP
>speakers but avoiding the RIP broadcast. I thought that with the neighbor
>command only the speakers would exchange RIP updates, but debugging IP RIP
>you can see that the routers are sending updates to 255.255.255.255 AND to
>the defined neighbors.
>is this a bug or have I missed something ?
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Erhan Kurt
>Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:01 PM
>To: zlf; Przemyslaw Karwasiecki
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: ospf and rip redistribution
>
>
>With OSPF area 0, do not try area range. Use Summary address in your ASBR.
>-if you do not have an ASBR in area 0, make a router ASBR via using
>redistribute connected with a strict route-map-
>
>
>Never Give Up,
>Erhan
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: zlf [mailto:pstn100@sina.com]
>Sent: 16 Temmuz 2002 Sal} 11:47
>To: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: ospf and rip redistribution
>
>
>The OSPF domain has a longer mask than the RIP domain, and they're on the
>same major network. we know RIP won't redistribute the route into RIP
>domain. if we cannot use static route,how we can resovle it. some book say
>ospf "area range" or "summary" can resovle this problem, but i have done
>some test, sometime it's ok,but sometime it won't. i think "area range" or
>"summary" is only function in ospf area and only aggregate ospf lsa, not
>produce route.so if in a single ospf area and i want redistribute the ospf
>network into rip domain,how i can do. my english is poor,i don't know if i
>say it clearly.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:32 GMT-3