Re: SNA's access-list

From: Fred Ingham (fingham@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jul 14 2002 - 16:04:57 GMT-3

• Next message: Anthony Pace: "RE: Redistribution techniques"
• Previous message: P729: "Re: cat 3550?"
• Maybe in reply to: Tom Young: "SNA's access-list"
• Next in thread: Tom Young: "Re: SNA's access-list"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Tom: Not True.
The first access list permits the SNA SAPs 00, 01, 04, 05, 08, 09, 0C, and
0D.

The second access-list permits SNA SAPs 0D and 0C.

Fred
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Young" <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 8:54 AM
Subject: SNA's access-list

> Hi,group
>
> I think the two access-list below are the same , for the
> SNA packet,right?
>
> 1,
> access-list 200 permit 0x0000 0x0D0D
>
> 2,
> access-list 200 permit 0x0D0D 0x0101
>
> Thanks
>

• Next message: Anthony Pace: "RE: Redistribution techniques"
• Previous message: P729: "Re: cat 3550?"
• Maybe in reply to: Tom Young: "SNA's access-list"
• Next in thread: Tom Young: "Re: SNA's access-list"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:30 GMT-3