From: Tom Young (gitsyoung@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 15 2002 - 02:46:18 GMT-3
Fred
You are right. But the reason that I ask the question
is the 00,01,04,05,08,09,0C was included into 0D, so the
two comand has the same function , right ?
Tom
--- Fred Ingham <fingham@cox.net> $B$+$i$N%a%C%;!<%8!'(B
> Tom: Not True.
> The first access list permits the SNA SAPs 00, 01,
> 04, 05, 08, 09, 0C, and
> 0D.
>
> The second access-list permits SNA SAPs 0D and 0C.
>
> Fred
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Young" <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 8:54 AM
> Subject: SNA's access-list
>
>
> > Hi,group
> >
> > I think the two access-list below are the same ,
> for the
> > SNA packet,right?
> >
> > 1,
> > access-list 200 permit 0x0000 0x0D0D
> >
> > 2,
> > access-list 200 permit 0x0D0D 0x0101
> >
> > Thanks
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:30 GMT-3