From: Joe Tabe (jtabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 12 2002 - 18:57:19 GMT-3
I ran into the same problem a few weeks back. I only found the solution by
debugging the isis adjacency.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jonathan V Hays
Sent: 12 July 2002 19:17
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: ISIS - subinterface needed?
Group,
I just had an interesting experience configuring ISIS on two routers.
One router (R1) had two serial subinterfaces, one of which was
point-to-point to another router running ISIS (R2). Now R2 was not
configured with subinterfaces, just "interface serial 0" since it was
only connected to R1 (via frame relay). I could not get ISIS routes to
appear in the routing tables of either router.
After I changed R2 to a point-to-point subinterface the ISIS routes
popped into both routing tables.
The question is, why is the point-to-point subinterface necessary on
both ends for ISIS to propagate routes?
Jonathan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:28 GMT-3