RE: IP EIGRP summary address problem with passive interface

From: Fanglo MA (fangloma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 10 2002 - 22:43:44 GMT-3

• Next message: lao ya li: "dlsw remote-peer tcp and dynamic option"
• Previous message: Tony Huang: "RE: ISDN & ppp multilink things..."
• Maybe in reply to: Raymond Jett: "RE: IP EIGRP summary address problem with passive interface"
• Next in thread: kasturi cisco: "RE: IP EIGRP summary address problem with passive interface"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi Harish,

Thanks for your reply. But the problem in concern is the passive interface
only connected with IGRP where that router running both EIGRP and IGRP. It
seems the passive interface command not only blocks the enqueue process to
physical interface but also affected the redistribution. My view to passive
interface is it only drop the packet out/in from the interface. Any idea?

Regards,
Fanglo

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Harish DV/peakxv
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:39 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IP EIGRP summary address problem with passive interface

Some one posted a problem with the scenario on Page 380 in tcp/ip vol.1
Actually, the passive interface command behaves differently in eigrp. Look
at this :

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/16.html

I guess this is 12.0.9 onwards.

The workaround is using a distribule list

HTH

Harish

• Next message: lao ya li: "dlsw remote-peer tcp and dynamic option"
• Previous message: Tony Huang: "RE: ISDN & ppp multilink things..."
• Maybe in reply to: Raymond Jett: "RE: IP EIGRP summary address problem with passive interface"
• Next in thread: kasturi cisco: "RE: IP EIGRP summary address problem with passive interface"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:26 GMT-3