From: Matt Wagner (miguknom@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jul 07 2002 - 19:42:51 GMT-3
Bki-directional NAT might solve your problem. I don't think there is any
way to make a router prefer something over a directly connected network. If
I am wrong, though, I would really like to know since I was trying to get
this same thing to work a coule of years ago...
Matt
----Original Message Follows----
From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
Reply-To: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
To: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
CC: Groupstudy ccielab list <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: Any way to change the AD of a connected network route ???
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 16:43:41 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [66.220.63.9] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
MHotMailBEF1E94B009B4004324942DC3F0907530; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 13:02:22 -0700
Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3)
with SMTP id UAA19218;Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:02:19 GMT
Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.13); Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:44:08
+0000
Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
TAA17374GroupStudy Mailer; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:44:08 GMT
Received: from OL191-106.fibertel.com.ar (OL191-106.fibertel.com.ar
[24.232.106.191]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA17331
GroupStudy Mailer; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:44:00 GMT
Received: from huapi.ba.ar ([172.30.0.2]:62981 "EHLO huapi.ba.ar") by
doors.ba.ar with ESMTP id <S50675AbSGGTnl>; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 16:43:41 -0300
>From nobody@groupstudy.com Sun, 07 Jul 2002 13:02:44 -0700
Message-ID: <3D2899ED.4FABF26F@huapi.ba.ar>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
References: <3D260E07.ADF27908@huapi.ba.ar> <3D2706EA.DDE7CB51@acedsl.com>
X-ASK-Info: Our key was found in the mail
Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
Precedence: bulk
This would change some routing protocol info, but connected routes
go into the FIB almost directly, so I guess this would not do it.
The reason I'm asking is because some times, I would like a
router connected to a network to forward the traffic to another router
and not to its interface.
elping wrote:
>
> I have not tried this...but how about
> redistribute connected route-map xxxx
>
> Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
>
> > Subject says it all...
> >
> > --
> > Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:21 GMT-3