From: Colin Barber (Colin.Barber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 06 2002 - 15:45:18 GMT-3
If the question states that Dlsw cannot have more than 30% at any time then
CAR would be needed as the other two methods are queueing technologies that
work when there is congestion. If there was no other traffic, CQ and CBWFQ
would allow Dlsw to use all the interface bandwidth.
You would not need to use priority for this and therefore you would only
need to define a policy for port 2065
Colin.
-----Original Message-----
From: John White [mailto:jan_white7@hotmail.com]
Sent: 05 July 2002 21:53
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Dlsw queueing methods
Hi guys,
I'm new to the group, so I started browsing archives recently. There is a
lot good stuff there.Some questions though seems to never recive answers.I
guess people use their privite e-mail accounts, instead of list.I notice ,
that in May 2002 there was discusion going on regarding bandwith allocation
for DLSw . The question was which method to use in order to allocate DlSw no
more than 30% of interface bandwith. (token or ehternet). Is it custom
queueing or CAR or CBWFQ?.Does it require to specify all 4 ports for traffic
or not (2065, 1981,1982,1983)
Thanks in advance
Jan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:20 GMT-3