From: John White (jan_white7@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 06 2002 - 15:07:12 GMT-3
That's fine. But which queueing method would you use, to restirict dlsw to
certain maximum bandwith? Is it custom queueing or policing-CAR. I'm really
confused on issue
Jan
>From: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
>Reply-To: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
>To: John White <jan_white7@hotmail.com>
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Dlsw queueing methods
>Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 11:56:41 -0400
>
>I was confused by this as well:
>to make it simple use
>
>only spcify port 2065 for dlsw...
>
>the other ports are used if you used priority
>
>John White wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> > I'm new to the group, so I started browsing archives recently. There is
>a
> > lot good stuff there.Some questions though seems to never recive
>answers.I
> > guess people use their privite e-mail accounts, instead of list.I notice
>,
> > that in May 2002 there was discusion going on regarding bandwith
>allocation
> > for DLSw . The question was which method to use in order to allocate
>DlSw no
> > more than 30% of interface bandwith. (token or ehternet). Is it custom
> > queueing or CAR or CBWFQ?.Does it require to specify all 4 ports for
>traffic
> > or not (2065, 1981,1982,1983)
> > Thanks in advance
> > Jan
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:20 GMT-3