From: David Ham (ccieau@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 01 2002 - 03:06:01 GMT-3
Hi Mas,
What is the major differenct in using the ip summary-address on rip and
eigrp
ip summary-address rip summary_address address_mask
ip summary-address eigrp as_number summary_address address_mask.
My understanding of summary-address eigrp is that whatever showing in the
routing table can be summaried and aggregated at the interface advertising.
But with summary-address rip, it seems to me that only the network belong to
the major subnet of interface advertising works. Is this correct???
Regards,
David Ham
>From: P729 <p729@cox.net>
>Reply-To: P729 <p729@cox.net>
>To: "Krucker, Louis" <louis.krucker@sunrise.net>, "'GOLBERY Irhne '"
><irene.golbery@arche.fr>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: rip summary-address
>Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 11:39:07 -0700
>
>In addition to disabling split horizon, the summary address and the
>interface it is being advertised on must share the same major net.
>
>Regards,
>
>Mas Kato
>https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Krucker, Louis" <louis.krucker@sunrise.net>
>To: "'GOLBERY Irhne '" <irene.golbery@arche.fr>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 9:20 AM
>Subject: RE: rip summary-address
>
>
> > Hello group
> >
> > Heres my config:
> >
> > The goal is to advertse one single route over e0 ( 172.31.0.0 / 16 )
> >
> > This config dont works in my lab, all single routes are advertised over
> > e0, even if i disable split horizon.
> >
> > Please correct me if i am wrong, may i dont get the point and i must use
> > another strategy.
> >
> > int e0
> > ip address 172.17.5.1 255.255.255.0
> > ip summary-address rip 172.31.0.0 255.255.0.0
> >
> > int loopback 1
> > ip address 172.31.2.1 255.255.255.0
> >
> > int loopback 2
> > ip address 172.31.3.1 255.255.255.0
> >
> > router rip
> > version 2
> > no auto-summary
> > network 172.17.0.0
> > network 172.31.0.0
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Louis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: GOLBERY Irhne
> > To: Krucker, Louis; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Sent: 30.06.2002 17:56
> > Subject: RE: rip summary
> >
> >
> > My understanding
> >
> > It is used in Network Access Server context and not for summarisation
> > like
> > we used to do in other routing protocol.
> >
> >
> > Example : 10 remote users connecting to a central router , in order not
> > to
> > have 10 hosts entry in the routing table of the central router you can
> > use
> > this command to summarize and only have a network or subnet entry in the
> > RIB
> >
> >
> > Correct me if i am wrong ?
> >
> > Irene
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Krucker, Louis [mailto:louis.krucker@sunrise.net]
> > Envoyi : dimanche 30 juin 2002 17:13
> > @ : 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Objet : rip summary
> >
> >
> > Hi Group
> >
> > I use rip v2 and no auto-summary, how the command ip rip summary-address
> > will work in this case. I did'nt found a detailed documentation in the
> > archive or at cco.
> >
> > This command does not work in my lab, i try to advertise a summary
> > route.
> > Are there any hints ? Even if i disable split-horizon no summary is
> > advertised. If i look in the rip database the route is there.
> >
> > Thanks for help
> >
> > Louis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:16 GMT-3