From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 29 2002 - 17:04:34 GMT-3
Thank you.
--- P729 <p729@cox.net> wrote:
> I should have said "routers belonging to the same
> area have, for that area,
> identical area link-state databases."
>
> Sorry for my error.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mas Kato
> https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "P729" <p729@cox.net>
> To: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Process ID selection in OSPF
>
>
> > There is no AS indication because it isn't
> relevant. The contents of the
> > synchronized database is what's relevant. Those
> routers that share the
> same
> > synchronized database are part of the same
> autonomous system, regardless
> of
> > the locally assigned process ID.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mas Kato
> > https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> > To: "P729" <p729@cox.net>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: Process ID selection in OSPF
> >
> >
> > > But how the router can decide whether other OSPF
> > > speaking router are in same autonumous system or
> not.
> > > Because there is no autonumous system
> indication. Is
> > > there some example two or more process id are
> configed
> > > on one router.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- P729 <p729@cox.net> wrote:
> > > > 'show ip ospf database' will dump the
> link-state
> > > > database for each process
> > > > ID. The router IDs under each process will
> give an
> > > > indication of what makes
> > > > up that autonomous system. An OSPF-speaking
> router
> > > > implements a unique RID
> > > > for each AS it participates in (each OSPF
> process).
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Mas Kato
> > > > https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> > > > To: <p729@cox.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:22 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Process ID selection in OSPF
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Dear Sir,
> > > > >
> > > > > But I have another question. Since process
> ID
> > > > number
> > > > > is completely arbitrary, how can I decide
> whether
> > > > > routers belong to same Autonamous System or
> not.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for help.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Peng Zheng
> > > > > --- p729@cox.net wrote:
> > > > > > The OSPF process ID number is completely
> > > > arbitrary
> > > > > > and only locally significant. It's used
> for
> > > > > > distinguishing between different OSPF
> processes
> > > > > > running on the same router.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mas Kato
> > > > > > https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
============================================================
> > > > > > From: Peng Zheng <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> > > > > > Date: 2002/06/20 Thu PM 04:50:13 EDT
> > > > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > > Subject: Process ID selection in OSPF
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I tried to use the Cisco Interactive
> Mentor, I
> > > > > > noticed they use different process ID on
> > > > different
> > > > > > router. Is there any benefit in this kind
> of
> > > > > > configuration?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you for help.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Peng Zheng
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:44 GMT-3