From: Ademola Osindero (osindero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jun 28 2002 - 14:07:31 GMT-3
Atul,
You could include the backup peer command if you are really keen on making
r2 a backup peer.
Ademola
At 01:28 PM 6/28/2002 +0000, Nii orfson wrote:
>No, dlsw explorer-wait-time on router 3 is not necessarily needed if
>router 1 is being preferred. However, the explorer-wait-time would ensure
>that r3 would wait for a certain amt of time before choosing one of the
>routers.
>Without it, it is quite possible that r2 might come up first and r3 might
>prefer r2 instead of r1.
>
>
>>From: "atul pawar" <atulpawar@hotmail.com>
>>Reply-To: "atul pawar" <atulpawar@hotmail.com>
>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: dlsw problem
>>Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:25:12 +0000
>>
>>hi guyes
>>I'm a bit confused about following dlsw setup. r3 is peering with r1 and
>>r2 . r1 has got cost 2 and r2 has got cost 4. So r1 would be preferred
>>path for a host on the Lan. In case r1 fails it would prefer r2. I have
>>normal dlsw config on all routers and bridge groups configured. My
>>question is do I need to configure the explorer-wait-time
>>timer on r3 so that it waits till it gets all responses back.? I have
>>seen configs where I don't see this timer. And also is there anything
>>else I need to configure ?
>>Cheers
>>Atul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> LAN
>>r1------------r2
>> \ /
>> \ /
>> \ FR /
>> |
>> |
>> r3---token-ring
>>
>> Atul
>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:43 GMT-3