From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jun 25 2002 - 21:05:28 GMT-3
My understanding is that VLs are in area 0.
So I would say that the router connected to area-0 + transit area
is not in the orphaned area. The transit area + orphaned area +
area-0 (via VL) should do the summarization.
Anthony Pace wrote:
>
> Is this correct:
>
> If an orphaned area is linked to the OSPF backbone with a virual-link,
> the router conected to the (orphaned area + transit area) is considered
> an Area-0 ABR. The router connected to the (transit Area + Area-0) is
> considered in all 3 areas. Is it corerect to apply summarization for
> the remote orphaned area on both of these rotuers, or just one or the
> other.
>
> Anthony Pace
> --
> Anthony Pace
> anthonypace@fastmail.fm
>
> --
> http://fastmail.fm - Click it, you'll feel better
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:41 GMT-3