From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jun 23 2002 - 05:36:06 GMT-3
For CCO,
The peer cost specified on the DLSw remote-peer statement
always overrides the peer
costs specified on the DLSw local-peers.
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 10:30 PM
Subject: DLSW cost characteristics
> to the dlsw gurus:
>
> I have noticed that i can influence the cost via the cost via the local
> peer command and the cost to this peer will be relayed to the remote
> peer ..and i will see the cost reflected in the sho capabilities .
>
> example:
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.14.8.8 cost 1 promiscuous
>
> but in a configuration as the one below
>
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.14.2.2 promiscuous
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.14.8.8 cost 1
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.14.7.7 cost 5
>
> does this state anything from this router will prefer the dlsw
> coonection to 172.14.1.1...
> in the remote peers I do not see the cost in the sho dlsw
> capabilities....
>
> is the below statement true
> influencing paths in dlsw can be made though local peer and remote peer
> statments .. ?
>
> now I will say it is true but due to i connot see it in the capabilities
> when i use it on a remote peer statement . I am questioning It...
>
> El ping
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:40 GMT-3