From: David Luu (wicked01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jun 23 2002 - 23:57:33 GMT-3
you are correct in that dlsw should use non-canonical addresses...when you
look at the "show dlsw reachability" output it shows the local mac address
reachability, this is the address you want to use which is already
translated in non-canonical format...so im assuming that in the book, the
netbios mac-address is already in non-canonical format
At 07:20 PM 6/23/2002 -0700, David Luu wrote:
>sorry about that...i thought you were referring the mac address of the
>router's e0
>
>At 10:02 AM 6/24/2002 +0800, li jian hua wrote:
>>HI David,
>>We all know dlsw command should use non-canonical address.
>>The Ethernet address is canonical,so we must change it to non-canonical
>>when using it by the dlsw command.
>>You say the book is right,please give a reason for it,or else you will
>>mislead a lot of people in the group.
>>rgds
>>jason
>>
>>At 14:30 2002-6-23 -0700, David Luu wrote:
>>>the book is correct...the dlsw icanreach mac-address does what it says,
>>>it can REACH the defined mac-address
>>>
>>>At 10:08 PM 6/23/2002 +0800, li jian hua wrote:
>>>>HI ALL,
>>>>At the page 934 of the book CCIE Practical studies,there is a
>>>>configuration:
>>>>dlsw icanreach mac-address 3745.1000.1010 mask ffff.ffff.ffff
>>>>dlsw bridge-group 1
>>>>
>>>>I think "mac-address 3745.1000.1010" should be written as
>>>>"mac-address eca2.0800.0808"
>>>>Because the mac-address 3745.1000.1010 is a pc under the e0 interface
>>>>of the router.
>>>>Here 3745.1000.1010 is an Ethernet MAC address.
>>>>
>>>>router(e0)------------pc(3745.1000.1010 0)
>>>>
>>>>please help.
>>>>rgds
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:40 GMT-3