From: elping (elpingu@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jun 23 2002 - 16:48:32 GMT-3
Thanks:
i kind of figured that......just needed some reinforment ...
If one overrides the cost why not display it.....that was getting me..
Edmund Roche-Kelly wrote:
> The cost in the local peer statement is the cost you advertise to
> remote peers. The cost on a remote peer statement sets that peers
> cost, and overrides the cost you receive from a remote peer. So
> if peer 172.14.7.7 below was sending you a cost of 4, you'd ignore
> it and assign 5 to the peer.
>
> Note that if you do show dlsw capabilities for that peer, you'll
> see the cost the peer advertised, not the cost you set.
>
> Ed
>
> elping <elpingu@acedsl.com> wrote:
> >to the dlsw gurus:
> >
> >I have noticed that i can influence the cost via the cost via the local
> >peer command and the cost to this peer will be relayed to the remote
> >peer ..and i will see the cost reflected in the sho capabilities .
> >
> >example:
> >dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.14.8.8 cost 1 promiscuous
> >
> >but in a configuration as the one below
> >
> >dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.14.2.2 promiscuous
> >dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.14.8.8 cost 1
> >dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.14.7.7 cost 5
> >
> >does this state anything from this router will prefer the dlsw
> >coonection to 172.14.1.1...
> >in the remote peers I do not see the cost in the sho dlsw
> >capabilities....
> >
> >is the below statement true
> >influencing paths in dlsw can be made though local peer and remote peer
> >statments .. ?
> >
> >now I will say it is true but due to i connot see it in the capabilities
> >when i use it on a remote peer statement . I am questioning It...
> >
> >El ping
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:40 GMT-3