From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 22 2002 - 12:39:47 GMT-3
Thank you very much.
--- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> wrote:
> If have two ospf process ids on one router, you have
> to have
> two ospf processes. Each should have its own set of
> interfaces
> by which they talk to other routers.
> (You can not share the same interface by two ospf
> processes)
>
> All routers that share the same area over one link
> will form
> adjacencies,
> and synchronize their topology of that area. ABR's
> will link different
> areas into one routing domain. This should (in a
> real world network)
> all inside one AS...
>
> You could have one router running 2 OSPF processes,
> one using some
> interfaces
> and the other using others. They would have
> different databases, and you
> could
> use redistribution between them to exchange routing
> information if you
> will.
>
>
>
> Peng Zheng wrote:
> >
> > If I use two process id on one router or multiple
> > routers and I don't want they share synchrinized
> > database, how can I implement it?
> >
> > Thank you for help.
> >
> > --- P729 <p729@cox.net> wrote:
> > > There is no AS indication because it isn't
> relevant.
> > > The contents of the
> > > synchronized database is what's relevant. Those
> > > routers that share the same
> > > synchronized database are part of the same
> > > autonomous system, regardless of
> > > the locally assigned process ID.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Mas Kato
> > > https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> > > To: "P729" <p729@cox.net>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:06 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Process ID selection in OSPF
> > >
> > >
> > > > But how the router can decide whether other
> OSPF
> > > > speaking router are in same autonumous system
> or
> > > not.
> > > > Because there is no autonumous system
> indication.
> > > Is
> > > > there some example two or more process id are
> > > configed
> > > > on one router.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- P729 <p729@cox.net> wrote:
> > > > > 'show ip ospf database' will dump the
> link-state
> > > > > database for each process
> > > > > ID. The router IDs under each process will
> give
> > > an
> > > > > indication of what makes
> > > > > up that autonomous system. An OSPF-speaking
> > > router
> > > > > implements a unique RID
> > > > > for each AS it participates in (each OSPF
> > > process).
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Mas Kato
> > > > > https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> > > > > To: <p729@cox.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:22 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: Process ID selection in OSPF
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Sir,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But I have another question. Since process
> ID
> > > > > number
> > > > > > is completely arbitrary, how can I decide
> > > whether
> > > > > > routers belong to same Autonamous System
> or
> > > not.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you for help.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Peng Zheng
> > > > > > --- p729@cox.net wrote:
> > > > > > > The OSPF process ID number is completely
> > > > > arbitrary
> > > > > > > and only locally significant. It's used
> for
> > > > > > > distinguishing between different OSPF
> > > processes
> > > > > > > running on the same router.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mas Kato
> > > > > > > https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
============================================================
> > > > > > > From: Peng Zheng <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> > > > > > > Date: 2002/06/20 Thu PM 04:50:13 EDT
> > > > > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > > > Subject: Process ID selection in OSPF
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I tried to use the Cisco Interactive
> Mentor,
> > > I
> > > > > > > noticed they use different process ID on
> > > > > different
> > > > > > > router. Is there any benefit in this
> kind of
> > > > > > > configuration?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you for help.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > Peng Zheng
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:40 GMT-3