From: George Spahl (g.spahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 20 2002 - 10:10:40 GMT-3
Since I started this thread off I feel obligated to try to un-muddy the
waters a little. Using PIM Sparse Mode and choosing to statically
configure the RP on all the routers it seemed that I couldn't get it to
work unless I configured the "ip pim rp-address" on the RP itself.
Well, I was having another (DLSW) problem and once it was fixed it no
longer seemed to require the manually configured address on the RP
itself. I would have to say it didn't seem to need it. However, as
someone said, configuring it on the RP didn't seem to do any harm
either. Sorry if I got anyone started down the wrong track!
Thanks,
George
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell)
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 8:56 PM
To: 'Treptow, Georg'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Multicasting - Sparse Mode Static RP
Georg is correct. Manual configuration on every router is necessary is
sparse mode.
Pags
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Treptow, Georg [SMTP:gxtrept@qwest.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 8:40 PM
> To: 'George Spahl'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Multicasting - Sparse Mode Static RP
>
> As far as I know you will have to use the rp-address command for
Sparse
> Mode.
>
> Georg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Spahl [mailto:g.spahl@insightbb.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 4:44 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Multicasting - Sparse Mode Static RP
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> When you're manually configuring the RP in a Sparse Mode network do
you
> need to manually configure the RP address on the RP itself as well as
> all the other routers? It seems to me that this is actually the case
> but one of my books says it's not necessary. Anyone?
>
> Thanks,
>
> George
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:38 GMT-3