From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 20 2002 - 09:12:51 GMT-3
Just to add to the mess, remember that DLSW+ is not DLSW.
And DLSWv2 uses 2067, not 2065.
steven.j.nelson@bt.com wrote:
>
> No it's not....
>
> When using priority keyword it's
>
> 2065 high
> 1981 medium
> 1982 normal
> 1983 low
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harish DV/peakxv [mailto:harish.dv@peakxv.net]
> Sent: 20 June 2002 10:20
> To: McCallum, Robert
> Cc: Anthony Pace; ccielab@groupstudy.com; 'elping';
> nobody@groupstudy.com; tr@contract.hu
> Subject: RE: What are all the ports for DLSw+ ?
>
> Hi..
>
> Its 1981/1982/1983 (medium/normal/high priporities respectively).
> where did you see 1984?.
>
> Harish
>
>
>
> "McCallum, Robert"
>
> <Robert.McCallum@let-it-b To: "'elping'"
> <elpingu@acedsl.com>, Anthony Pace <anthonypace@fastmail.fm>
> e-thus.com> cc:
> tr@contract.hu, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> Sent by: Subject: RE: What
> are all the ports for DLSw+ ?
> nobody@groupstudy.com
>
>
>
>
>
> 06/20/2002 01:25 AM
>
> Please respond to
>
> "McCallum, Robert"
>
>
>
>
>
> Folks,
>
> The default port number used by DLSW is 2065. If you specify the keyword
> priority in the DLSW peer statement then this opens up 1982, 1982, 1983 and
> 1984. If there is no priority keyword and you specify in an access-list
> any other number other than 2065 I would say - if this was in an exam like
> -
> that you were 100% wrong.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elping [mailto:elpingu@acedsl.com]
> Sent: 20 June 2002 06:40
> To: Anthony Pace
> Cc: tr@contract.hu; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: What are all the ports for DLSw+ ?
>
> ok without looking
> 1981
> 1982
> 2065
> 2067
>
> let's see if i am getting rusty
>
> Anthony Pace wrote:
>
> > I see tcp(2065) and udp(2067) hitting my ACL but I imagine this is just
> > to set up the peers. If traffic were passing through a circuit does it
> > use tcp(1981-83). Does it use different ports for SNA versus NetBios?
> >
> > Does FST use prot-id 91 for every thing?
> >
> > Anthony Pace
> >
> > On Thu, 06 Jun 2002 19:35:14 +0200 (CEST), tr@contract.hu said:
> > > more detailed at:
> > >
> > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dlsw5_rg.htm
> > >
> > >
> > > Quoting Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>:
> > >
> > > > You'have to use priority in dlsw+ to separate 4 queues,
> > > > and use SAP ACLs to separate netbios from SNA into
> > > > different TCP ports (2065/1981/1982/1983).
> > > > Finally, use CQ to separate IPX, and 2 dlsw+ ports...
> > > >
> > > > "Hung, Sing-Yu" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear,
> > > > >
> > > > > Can Someone tell me how to do dlsw traffic queueing as
> > > > below?
> > > > > SNA 50%(packet size 1024)
> > > > > IPX 25%(packet size 512)
> > > > > netbios 25%(packet size 256)
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know how to define netbios and ipx under queue-list
> > > > >
> > > > > Bradford Hung
> > > > >
> > > > > Pacific Century CyberWorks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:38 GMT-3