From: David Luu (wicked01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jun 14 2002 - 04:02:27 GMT-3
well there lies your problem...the reason why R2 can peer with R1 and R3 is
because they are directly connected, same reason why R3 is able to peer
with R2 and R4...in order for R1 to peer with R4, it needs to know how to
get there (even with no synch), so you either need an IGP or a static route
for them to talk to each other
At 02:30 PM 6/14/2002 +0800, chenyan wrote:
>no igp
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "David Luu" <wicked01@ix.netcom.com>
>To: "chenyan" <chenyan@deeptht.com.cn>; "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:18 PM
>Subject: Re: bgp neighbor problem
>
>
> > do you have an IGP with a route that provides a way for R1 and R4 to reach
> > each other?
> >
> > At 01:26 PM 6/14/2002 +0800, chenyan wrote:
> > >R1---R2---R3---R4 .
> > >they connect side by side, and config them in an AS with ibgp full
> meshed,
> > >R1/R2/R3 and R2/R3/R4 can neighbor each, but R1 and R4 cant neighbor each
> > >other. why?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:33 GMT-3