From: Anthony Pace (anthonypace@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 12 2002 - 16:33:02 GMT-3
I I have a TR LAN and 1 peer with Eth and one peer with TR; should the
LF go on the remote-peer for the Eth and my local-peer, or should only
Ethernet remote peer statements have the LF so that I may non-fragmnet
going to my TR peer?
Anthony Pace
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:46:29 +0300, "Erhan Kurt" <kurt@superonline.net>
said:
> If you use LF 1500 (for TR) in DLSW between TR-Eth, no fragmentation will be
> done. But, as I said before you don't have to use it. Just smell the
> question to use it...
>
>
> Erhan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Pace [mailto:anthonypace@fastmail.fm]
> Sent: 09 Haziran 2002 Pazar 03:51
> To: Jason Sinclair; 'cholscurry'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: about DLSW option(lf 1500)
>
>
> What purpose does the "LF" option server then if the peers figure out the
> lowest common denominator and fragment packets accordingly? I was under the
> impression that if one of your peers had an Ethernet LAN and you were TR,
> you put it on the RP statement but if you were the Ethernet peer you could
> put it on your local peer statement to let the other side know to fragment?
> Is that wrong?
>
> Anthony Pace
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 16:47:19 +1000 , "Jason Sinclair"
> <sinclairj@powertel.com.au> said:
> > DLSW will dynamically figure out the LF size in the capabilities
> > exchange. Hence you do not need to set it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jason Sinclair CCIE #9100
> > Manager, Network Control Centre
> > POWERTEL
> > Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
> > SYDNEY NSW 2000
> > AUSTRALIA
> > office: + 61 2 8264 3820
> > mobile: + 61 416 105 858
> > * sinclairj@powertel.com.au
> >
> > "The choices we make, not the chances we take, determine our destiny"
> > - Unknown
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cholscurry [mailto:cholscurry@yahoo.co.kr]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 5 June 2002 16:13
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: about DLSW option(lf 1500)
> >
> > hi, all
> >
> > i have one easy question about dlsw config.
> >
> > if routerA with Ethernet and RouterB with Tokenring
> > have a dlsw connection,
> > do i have to use lf(largest frame) frame_size option
> > on both local peer and remote peer command?
> >
> > thanks all.
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:31 GMT-3