From: Chris Hugo (chrishugo@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jun 11 2002 - 13:15:08 GMT-3
Hi Tom,
The HSRP load balancing solution should work also. It all depends on what the o
bjective is you need to fill. If you want a primary/backup scenario HSRP or nor
mal iBGP peering will work fine. If you are running iBGP and want to utilize b
oth peer routers at the same time for data traffic than you can use Multipath i
BGP. It's all about meeting your customer's objective. :)
thanx,
chris hugo
Tom Young <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp> wrote: Hi,
Thanks for your reply. And I thought out a more better
way, but I couldn't besure it will working.
I could set r1 and r2 be a HSRP peer. The virtual ip
address is the gateway. Although it couldn't load balance,
but it could be backup routing by setting the prority of
r1&r2. Right?
Thanks
--- Chris Hugo $+$i$N%a%C%;!<%8!'
> Hi,
> Try maximum-paths ibgp. This command will allow your
> router to place multiple iBGP routes in your IP
> routing table. The BGP table will still pick out one
> route as the "BEST" route. The "BEST" route was
> determined by lowest router-id in this case. But as
> you can see I posted a snip of my routing table that
> indeed shows two routes in the routing table along
> with some other configs and shows.
> hth,
> chris hugo
> rb#b 172.16.50.0
> BGP routing table entry for 172.16.50.0/24, version
> 90
> Paths: (2 available, best #1)
> Multipath: iBGP
> Advertised to peer-groups:
> A
> Local, (Received from a RR-client)
> 172.16.1.2 from 172.16.1.2 (200.200.9.1)
> Origin IGP, metric 500, localpref 100, valid,
> internal, multipath, best
> Local, (Received from a RR-client)
> 172.16.70.2 from 172.16.70.2 (207.36.76.1)
> Origin IGP, metric 500, localpref 100, valid,
> internal, multipath
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:31 GMT-3