From: Certworth (ccie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jun 11 2002 - 08:20:07 GMT-3
Buddies, Here we go:-
Steven,
(a). I did use the broadacst keyword (this was easy one :-) and I believe
this would let the multicast EIGRP packets go across to the other end.
I did not use the passive command though.
The first try was on the Physical Interface and I then tried a
Point-to-point sub-interface with "broadcast" keyword
This made no difference.
Nick/Curtis,
(b). Used a "Neighbor" command and it should force EIGRP process to use
unicast hellos instead of Multicast.
Didn't work. Unfortunately, the Other end is not accessible at this
time.....you can understand that....
Andy,
I will do a lookup on this but I thought that the "broadcast" keyword
eliminates the need for explicit multicast address mapping... Am I missing
out on stuff ???
Thanks a lot for you postings and once this is done, I have a few more
challenges...
---------------------Original
Message:------------------------------------------------------
I have an ATM attached local Router under my control ...
I now have the challenge of forming EIGRP adjacency with another Cisco
Router
across the service provider ATM Cloud.
---------
I discover PVC parameters using LMI.
I configure the VPI/VCI and map IP parameters.
Vow !!! I can ping the other end right away.
But no EIGRP adjacency in sight...... debug eigrp "x" does not bring any
clue...
What would you folks suggest ???
Thanks,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:31 GMT-3