From: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx
Date: Tue Jun 11 2002 - 06:40:01 GMT-3
Anthony
DLSw does not address SR/TLB issues where there is an Ethernet and a TR
interface on the same box, you still have to know how to do this, look up
the source bridge transparent command.
HTH
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Pace [mailto:anthonypace@fastmail.fm]
Sent: 10 June 2002 00:25
To: Nick Shah; Jason Cash; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Is SR/TLB on the CCIE lab in any other for besides DLSW+
It is my understanding that DLSW+ is the current favorite way to glue
non-routable traffic between Etherenet and/or Token Ring LANS across
various kinds of WANS. DLSW+ , for the most part, takes care of all
differences in addressing.
Could SR/TLB be on the CCIE test as well, or does DLSW+ make that
obsolete?
Anthony Pace
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:54:03 +1000, "Nick Shah" <nshah@connect.com.au>
said:
> Jason,
>
> I am not particularly referring to Solie or any other lab, but you need
> atleast 2 routers with token ring cards, and one of them *must* have
> token+ethernet (its good if the other has token+ethernet, otherwise
> token
> only should be ok). This will enable you to run SRB, SR/TLB
> (translational
> bridging). Unless of course you work with token ring in your day to day
> life, then you can skip it.
>
> rgds
> Nick
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Cash" <cash2001@swbell.net>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:17 AM
> Subject: Token Ring in home lab
>
>
> > I currently have only 2501 routers and a 4500 with 4 serial and 2 eth.
> > My question is, should I invest in a 2 token card for the 4500? Is it
> > feasible to invest in this card (i.e. can I run some of the Solie labs)
> > with only one device having TR? I am referring to the bridging DLSW,
> > RSRB labs, etc.
> >
> > Here is the link to the card I am considering:
> >
> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem
> > <http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2029951844>
> > &item=2029951844
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:31 GMT-3