RE: FRTS

From: Erhan Kurt (kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jun 11 2002 - 04:37:58 GMT-3


   
For example, in voice, Tc=125 msec may cause pain :)

Never Ever Give Up,
Erhan

-----Original Message-----
From: Katson PN Yeung [mailto:kyeung@hkcix.com]
Sent: 11 Haziran 2002 Sal} 10:39
To: Erhan Kurt; Michael Popovich; CCIE GROUPSTUDY
Subject: RE: FRTS

A minor correction about "frame-relay traffic-rate" commend in the
map-class frame-relay.

After you specified traffic-rate, everything displayed will be in
bit-per-second, but internally all other values, such as Bc, Be, CIR,
mincir are still be calculated in tc=125ms.

At 03:00 PM 6/11/2002, Erhan Kurt wrote:
>Tc=Bc/CIR
>
>Look at output of time interval as an important thing in QoS.. With
>traffic-rate, you cannot specify any Tc (default=125 msec).
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Popovich [mailto:m.popovich@mchsi.com]
>Sent: 09 Haziran 2002 Pazar 23:49
>To: CCIE GROUPSTUDY
>Subject: FRTS
>
>
>What is the difference between this:
>
>map-class frame-relay p2p
> frame-relay cir 400000
> frame-relay bc 8000
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
>
>Interface Se0/0.1
> Access Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
Adapt
>VC List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
>Active
>104 400000 1000 8000 0 20 1000 -
>
>and this:
>
>map-class frame-relay p2p
> frame-relay traffic-rate 400000 408000
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
>
>Interface Se0/0.1
> Access Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
Adapt
>VC List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
>Active
>104 400000 7250 400000 8000 125 6250 -
>
>
>
>I see some differences in the output but could someone explain the
>functional differences here and what impact it would have.
>
>I have been looking at some lab questions that require setting up
>traffic shaping and give you a cir and a bir value. The solution used
>the frame-relay traffic-rate under the map-class where as I was looking
>towards setting the CIR and the Bc values. I am a little confused on
>the BIR value.
>
>TIA
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:31 GMT-3