From: Erhan Kurt (kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 10 2002 - 05:46:29 GMT-3
If you use LF 1500 (for TR) in DLSW between TR-Eth, no fragmentation will be
done. But, as I said before you don't have to use it. Just smell the
question to use it...
Erhan
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Pace [mailto:anthonypace@fastmail.fm]
Sent: 09 Haziran 2002 Pazar 03:51
To: Jason Sinclair; 'cholscurry'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: about DLSW option(lf 1500)
What purpose does the "LF" option server then if the peers figure out the
lowest common denominator and fragment packets accordingly? I was under the
impression that if one of your peers had an Ethernet LAN and you were TR,
you put it on the RP statement but if you were the Ethernet peer you could
put it on your local peer statement to let the other side know to fragment?
Is that wrong?
Anthony Pace
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 16:47:19 +1000 , "Jason Sinclair"
<sinclairj@powertel.com.au> said:
> DLSW will dynamically figure out the LF size in the capabilities
> exchange. Hence you do not need to set it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jason Sinclair CCIE #9100
> Manager, Network Control Centre
> POWERTEL
> Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
> SYDNEY NSW 2000
> AUSTRALIA
> office: + 61 2 8264 3820
> mobile: + 61 416 105 858
> * sinclairj@powertel.com.au
>
> "The choices we make, not the chances we take, determine our destiny"
> - Unknown
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cholscurry [mailto:cholscurry@yahoo.co.kr]
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 June 2002 16:13
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: about DLSW option(lf 1500)
>
> hi, all
>
> i have one easy question about dlsw config.
>
> if routerA with Ethernet and RouterB with Tokenring
> have a dlsw connection,
> do i have to use lf(largest frame) frame_size option
> on both local peer and remote peer command?
>
> thanks all.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:30 GMT-3