From: Tom Larus (tlarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 06 2002 - 14:35:19 GMT-3
One is old form (sort of) and one is new form. I think you left a remnant
of old form atm config when you put "atm pvc 1 0 36" instead of simply "pvc
0/32"
----- Original Message -----
From: <andypilcher2@earthlink.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Quick ATM map question
> Quick question... what's the difference between the following two configs?
Assume two routers on the ends of an ATM cloud w/ a defined PVC (VPI 0 and
VCI 36). Just trying to get IP connetivity between them. As far as I can
tell the difference is just a level of complexity, they seem to do the same
thing.
>
> in atm0/0
> ip add 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> atm pvc 1 0 36
> protocol ip 10.1.1.2 broadcast
>
> **OR**
>
> in atm0/0
> ip add 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> atm pvc 1 0 36
> map-group ATM_MAP
> !
> map-list atm ATM_MAP
> ip 10.1.1.2 atm-vc 1 broadcast
>
>
> Andy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:27 GMT-3