From: Jeffery S Kimes (kimes@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 06 2002 - 11:52:18 GMT-3
I was under the impression that the distribute-list out under the routing
protocol designated which routes to advertise, not whom to advertise them
to?
Jeff Kimes
Senior I/T Specialist
I/T Consulting & Implementation Services
kimes@us.ibm.com
Erhan Kurt
<kurt@superonline To: "Hung, Sing-Yu" <Sing-
Yu.Hung@pccw.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
.net> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: RIP route distribu
te
nobody@groupstudy
.com
06/06/2002 06:07
AM
Please respond to
Erhan Kurt
Use interface, like below:
Router rip
Distribute-list 10 out e1
Erhan
-----Original Message-----
From: Hung, Sing-Yu [mailto:Sing-Yu.Hung@pccw.com]
Sent: 06 Haziran 2002 Per:embe 15:35
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: RIP route distribute
Hi,
If standard access-list, r2 lo0 both not send to r1 and to
r3.And I
haven't ideal how to use extended list for distribution.Please help?
Bradford Hung
Pacific Century CyberWorks
-----Original Message-----
From: steven.j.nelson@bt.com [mailto:steven.j.nelson@bt.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:11 PM
To: Hung, Sing-Yu; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: RIP route distribute
Distribute list, perhaps ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Hung, Sing-Yu [mailto:Sing-Yu.Hung@pccw.com]
Sent: 06 June 2002 12:56
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RIP route distribute
Dear,
r1----------------rip----------(e0)r2(e1)-----------rip-----------r3
R2 have loop0: 50.0.0.1/24
r2 e0:172.16.11.1/24
r2 e1:172.16.12.1/24
If someone can tell me how to config on r2 such that r2 lo0 is only sand to
r1 and not to r3?
Bradford Hung
Pacific Century CyberWorks
Tel: 288 33125
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:27 GMT-3