From: Paul (p_chopin@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 06 2002 - 01:42:45 GMT-3
That's right.You may have to use backdoor commnad on
R2.
Paul
--- Nick Shah <nshah@connect.com.au> wrote:
> Paul, I am going to lab up this issue today. Just a
> couple of queries ..
>
> * Is R1 running only RIP & BGP ?
> * Is R2 running RIP, OSPF & BGP ?
>
>
> rgds
> Nick
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul" <p_chopin@yahoo.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 12:58 PM
>
>
> > Hi group,
> > I just run into another interesting little
> problem.
> > I have R1-R2---R3
> > | |
> > \ /
> > R4---R5
> > R1 is running RiP. R2,R3,R4,R5 are running ospf.
> R2 is
> > redistributing rip into ospf domain.R1 is
> inserting
> > route 200.100.100.0/24 to BGP through network
> > statement and Redistributing this route into Rip
> as
> > well. R1 is in AS1 , R2 in AS3, and R5,R4,R5 in As
> > 3.EBGP sessions R1-R2, R2-R3. IBGP sesions R3-R4,
> > R4-R5. R4 is route reflector.Synch is enable on
> all
> > the routers.Question is why on R4 BGP table says,
> that
> > route 200.100.100.0/24 is not synchronized even
> it's
> > known through ospf and is not being pushed to R5.
> > All routers have hard coded identical routers id
> in
> > ospf and BGP.
> > I've been struggling almost a week with this one.I
> > searched and read white papers on CCO - I still
> don't
> > understand.I'm missing really something
> important.
> > Can you help?
> > Paul
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:26 GMT-3