From: Bola Adegbonmire (BolaAD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 05 2002 - 08:13:43 GMT-3
It occurred to me after I sent the mail that I assumed this about your topology
. Namely: That the link between your R5 and R6 was the 150.100.2.0/24 subnet. W
ith this what I said might have worked. I realised that what you have is probab
ly that there is no 150.100.0.0 subnet on R5 in your topology, that is you actu
ally have 150.100.0.0 as a discontiguos network in this topology. If this is th
e case then you are right, it won't work and only IP default-netwok or a second
ary address solution will work.You are right oif this is your topology.
-----Original Message-----
From: jfaure@sztele.com [mailto:jfaure@sztele.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Bola Adegbonmire
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ROUTE INJECTION TO A CLASSFULL PROTOCOL FROM A CLASSLESS ONE
Hi Bola:
I tested thiat you said (to do a summary of the ospf external 2 route and redis
tribute that summary, but didn't work. The only way I know for the moment to do
so is using "ip default network" command.
Regards
Juan Faure Ferrer
email: jfaure@sztele.com
Lmnea de Negocio de Telematica y CC
Ingeniero de Integracisn de Redes y Sistemas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLUZIONA TELECOMUNICACIONES
Servicios Profesionales de UNION FENOSA
Jerez, 3
28016 MADRID
tel 91 579 30 00 fax 91 350 72 83
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Bola
Adegbonmire" Para: <jfaure@sztele.com>
<BolaAD@Resource cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
ry.com.ng> Asunto: RE: ROUTE INJECTION TO A CLA
SSFULL
PROTOCOL FROM A CLASSLESS ONE
04/06/02 13:36
I believe because this route arrives in R5 the OSPF-IGRP red router as E2 type,
it will allow you to do summary-address 150.100.1.0/24 and consequetly pass it
on to the IGRP domain, which only has subnet 150.100.2.0/24 . Why did you not
try this? Although it will also pass it on to R2 and you will probably have to
filter this route, if you do not want this undesirable route.Though the route i
s to Null 0 in R5.
Am I missing anything in your topology?
Why would you not be able to pass it on to igrp domain?
-----Original Message-----
From: jfaure@sztele.com [mailto:jfaure@sztele.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:13 AM
To: Cheol
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ROUTE INJECTION TO A CLASSFULL PROTOCOL FROM A CLASSLESS ONE
Yes, when I redistribute from IGRP to OSPF I use the "subnets" option obviously
. The problem, as I said in the first mail, is the redistribution from OSPF to
IGRP: although I've the 150.100.1.0/24 ospf external type 2 route in the R5 tab
le, I can't pass it to the R6 router (this router only speaks IGRP, the R5 spea
kes OSPF and IGRP).
Regards.
Juan Faure Ferrer
email: jfaure@sztele.com
Lmnea de Negocio de Telematica y CC
Ingeniero de Integracisn de Redes y Sistemas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----SOLUZIONA TELECOMUNICACIONES Servicios Profesionales de UNION FENOSA Jerez, 3 28016 MADRID tel 91 579 30 00 fax 91 350 72 83 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---
"Cheol"
<netp@enclue.c Para: <jfaure@sztele.com>
om> cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com> Asunto: Re: ROUTE INJECTION TO A CLASS FULL 03/06/02 09:56 PROTOCOL FROM A CLASSLESS ONE
Do you put into the router configuration as keyword "redistribute igrp x x x x subnet"?
May be make it that you want!!!
=================== =========================================================== ==== (?) ??? ??? ???? ???? 13-25 ???? 203? ??: 02-784-0957~8 ??: 02-784-0959 ? ? ?(???? Network Engineer) ???: 016-263-1632 ================================== ============================= ----- Original Message ----- From: <jfaure@sztele.com> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 6:30 AM Subject: ROUTE INJECTION TO A CLASSFULL PROTOCOL FROM A CLASSLESS ONE
> Hi Guys! > > > I would like to inject to an IGRP domain a route from an OSPF domain. This > is my scenario: > > > ROUTERS: R6------------------R5 > --------------------------R2-------------------(EIGRP Network) > > R. PROTOCOL IGRP IGRP-OSPF > EIGRP-OSPF > > > R5 is redistributing OSPF to IGRP and IGRP to OSPF. R2 is doing the > same with EIGRP and OSPF. The network I want to pass to R6 is a > network that appears in the R5 routing table as an external type 2 > OSPF network (because > it comes from the previous EIGRP domain) The problem is that the R6 router > has a directed connected network of the same classfull address that > the route I wan to advertise to it. This is, I want to pass the > network 150.100.1.0/24 (from OSPF, from R5) to R6, but one of the > network interfaces of R6 has the address 150.100.2.1/24, then it > appears in R6 as directly connected. > > Do you know how can I achieve this? I've tried several thinghs, but I can't > pass any 150.100.0.0 IGRP entry to the router table of R6 that points > to R5. > > Regards > > > > > Juan Faure Ferrer > email: jfaure@sztele.com > > Lmnea de Negocio de Telematica y CC > Ingeniero de Integracisn de Redes y Sistemas > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
> > SOLUZIONA TELECOMUNICACIONES > Servicios Profesionales de UNION FENOSA > Jerez, 3 > 28016 MADRID > tel 91 579 30 00 fax 91 350 72 83 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:25 GMT-3