Re: voip udp port range question

From: ying chang (ying_c@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jun 02 2002 - 10:23:03 GMT-3

• Next message: Nigel Taylor: "Re: dlsw large-frame option"
• Previous message: Alex Wong: "OT : Can PIX filtering by MAC address"
• Maybe in reply to: ying chang: "voip udp port range question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Eric,

Thanks. I was confused with ip rtp priority alright.

Chang

>From: eric ong <ongyongk@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: eric ong <ongyongk@yahoo.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: voip udp port range question
>Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 14:54:21 +0800 (CST)
>
> --- ying chang <ying_c@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Is this a mistake? Is 32767 supposed to be 16383?
> >
> > access-list 102 permit udp any any range 16384 37276
>
>
>pls correct me if i'm wrong, it should be: access-list range 16384 32767
>
>don't get confused with: ip rtp priority 16384 16383
>where 16383 is added to 16384 to get the upper limit of 32767
>
>eric
>

• Next message: Nigel Taylor: "Re: dlsw large-frame option"
• Previous message: Alex Wong: "OT : Can PIX filtering by MAC address"
• Maybe in reply to: ying chang: "voip udp port range question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:21 GMT-3