From: Michael Breen (mbreen@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 01 2002 - 15:24:33 GMT-3
PPPOE will use your WAN port (E0) and will pick up an address in one of two
ways....
1. ISP assigned (DHCP)
2. Statically assigned by the ISP
The LAN port will connect to your internal network using an internal network
address space. You will NAT overloading the WAN ports address to get access
to the Internet. No routing protocols needed if you only have one address
space on the LAN side (static and default routes).
--MB
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Tom
Young
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 11:49 AM
To: John Underhill
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IP address for PPPoE
John,
Thank you for reply me so quick. and you said I could
use a static ip address. I want to ask you may I set a
globe address on my e0 port? I think I should get the
address from ISP by negotiation parameter setting, right?
And then , I want to ask if I connect a router to ADSL
modem by PPPoE, which port should I use, the ether port or
the wan port?
Thanks alot
Young
--- John Underhill <stepnwlf@magma.ca> $B$+$i$N%a%C%;!<%8(B
$B!'(B
> If you are looking to have all your routers avail to
> the net, I would set
> the e0 address as static, define it as the global
> address and use NAT for
> the conversion. ex
> ip nat pool mypool 200.1.1.1 200.1.1.1 netmask
> 255.255.255.0
> ip nat inside source list 1 pool mypool overload
> access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Young" <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 1:15 PM
> Subject: IP address for PPPoE
>
>
> > HI, everybody
> >
> > I am using a router was configed PPPoE access
> the ISP
> > through ADSL modem, But I don't know the ip
> address in the
> > two ether ports.
> > If I using the e0 to ADSL modem and e1 to LAN.
> >
> > 1, e0 will receive a IP address from ISP, by
> negotiation.
> > For the e1 I could config private address
> free,(for
> > example 192.168.1.254) right?
> >
> > 2, Should I do some routing protocol for the
> routing
> > between e0 and Lan?
> >
> > Thanks alot
> >
> > Young
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:19 GMT-3