From: Nick Shah (nshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 31 2002 - 23:49:20 GMT-3
I could be wrong. but how about...
neighbor x.y.z.a remote-as <<backbone as>>
neighbor x.y.z.a default-originate
This *could* be a third way of injecting the *route*. Of course this will
inject a default route, but it is one method that satisfies both of your
criteria (ie. dont use network or redistribute, dont use static, no other
ibgp/ebgp peers should know about this route)
What do you think ?
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "McEvoy, Joseph" <Joseph.McEvoy@us.didata.com>
To: "'David Luu'" <wicked01@ix.netcom.com>; "McEvoy, Joseph"
<Joseph.McEvoy@us.didata.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: Question: Alternative way of injecting routes into BGP?
> That is not working because I do not have any subnets of 135.3.0.0 /16 in
my
> bgp table. That's because I haven't used any network or redistribute
> commands.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Luu [mailto:wicked01@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:47 PM
> To: Joseph McEvoy; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Question: Alternative way of injecting routes into BGP?
>
> aggregate-address 135.3.0.0 255.255.0.0 summary-only
>
> At 08:51 PM 5/31/2002 -0400, Joseph McEvoy wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I know of two ways to get routes injected into BGP. The first is the
> network
> >command, the second is to redistriubute. Does anybody know of a third
way?
> >
> >I am doing a lab where the directions state that I need to advertize my
> pod's
> >topology 135.3.0.0 /16 to the backbone (in a different AS) without using
> the
> >redistribute command and without using the network command. It also
states
> >that I can not use any static routes. Lastly it sates that this route
> should
> >not appear on any of the routers in my pod, just on the backbone. How in
> the
> >world can this be done?
> >
> >TIA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:13 GMT-3