From: Nick Shah (nshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 01 2002 - 00:23:00 GMT-3
Parry,
I agree with you but......
If you read Joseph's criteria, it states advertise a network without using
NETWORK or REDISTRIBUTE command plus advertise only to this one peer. This
would narrow down to advertising a default route to the neighbor.
If you chose to disagree, pl. advise an alternate way to satisfy Joseph's
criteria
rgds
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chua, Parry" <Parry.Chua@hp.com>
To: "Nick Shah" <nshah@connect.com.au>; "McEvoy, Joseph"
<Joseph.McEvoy@us.didata.com>; "David Luu" <wicked01@ix.netcom.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: Question: Alternative way of injecting routes into BGP?
You tell your neigh x.y.z.a that your AS is the defaut route for their
network. It sound like
some information is missing. If you don't even know such network within your
AS, how can you
advertise and tell other how to reach that network.
> Parry Chua
>
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Shah [mailto:nshah@connect.com.au]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:49 AM
To: McEvoy, Joseph; 'David Luu'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Question: Alternative way of injecting routes into BGP?
I could be wrong. but how about...
neighbor x.y.z.a remote-as <<backbone as>>
neighbor x.y.z.a default-originate
This *could* be a third way of injecting the *route*. Of course this will
inject a default route, but it is one method that satisfies both of your
criteria (ie. dont use network or redistribute, dont use static, no other
ibgp/ebgp peers should know about this route)
What do you think ?
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "McEvoy, Joseph" <Joseph.McEvoy@us.didata.com>
To: "'David Luu'" <wicked01@ix.netcom.com>; "McEvoy, Joseph"
<Joseph.McEvoy@us.didata.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: Question: Alternative way of injecting routes into BGP?
> That is not working because I do not have any subnets of 135.3.0.0 /16 in
my
> bgp table. That's because I haven't used any network or redistribute
> commands.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Luu [mailto:wicked01@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:47 PM
> To: Joseph McEvoy; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Question: Alternative way of injecting routes into BGP?
>
> aggregate-address 135.3.0.0 255.255.0.0 summary-only
>
> At 08:51 PM 5/31/2002 -0400, Joseph McEvoy wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I know of two ways to get routes injected into BGP. The first is the
> network
> >command, the second is to redistriubute. Does anybody know of a third
way?
> >
> >I am doing a lab where the directions state that I need to advertize my
> pod's
> >topology 135.3.0.0 /16 to the backbone (in a different AS) without using
> the
> >redistribute command and without using the network command. It also
states
> >that I can not use any static routes. Lastly it sates that this route
> should
> >not appear on any of the routers in my pod, just on the backbone. How in
> the
> >world can this be done?
> >
> >TIA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:13 GMT-3