From: Ted Richmond (rich_ted@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 28 2002 - 15:26:39 GMT-3
Thankyou all for your comments.
I tried all your suggestions - tried
explorer-wait-time 30, gave equal weights to both the
Peers & gave 'dlsw load-balance circuit-weight' - No
Luck.
I even tried 2 different images on my R1 - 12.2-3.2 &
12.2-6. Now I am having doubts that if this scenario
works at all. It works right? Please tell me that it
worked for you - this way I can keep trying.
Thanks.
"Lupi, Guy" wrote:
>
> To add to Rick's comments, try increasing your
explorer wait time, it is
> done with the "dlsw timers" command. Here is a
great link from CCO that
> explains, it is on the doc cd, watch the wrap.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120
> t/120t3/loadbal.htm#xtocid63267
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bauer, Rick
> To: 'Aamer Kaleem'; Nigel Taylor;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: 5/27/2002 9:07 AM
> Subject: RE: Dlsw load-balancing
>
> Weight only applies when doing load balance
circuit-count. Weight is
> used
> like this, peer 1 has weight of 20 peer 2 has weight
of 10. Peer one
> will
> have a 2:1 ratio of circuits created through it.
>
> Round robin uses cost only, try increasing you
explorer-wait-time.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aamer Kaleem [mailto:kaleemaamer@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 8:28 AM
> To: Nigel Taylor; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Dlsw load-balancing
>
> Check this link from CCO, i guess you need to use
> WEIGHT parameter:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/
> ibm_
> c/bcprt2/bcddlsw.htm#xtocid1133249
>
> Thanx,
> ak
> --- Nigel Taylor <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Ted,
> > Have you looked("show dlsw capabilities"
on
> > R1) at the cost of each
> > peer from R1-R2 and R1-R3.
> > Remember that during the capabilities exchange if
> > not specified these peers
> > will use the default cost values.
> > Try making use of the keyword "cost x" (between
1-5)
> > on your R1-R2 and R1-R3
> > remote-peer statements.
> > Let's see what happens
> >
> > Nigel
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ted Richmond" <rich_ted@yahoo.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 5:05 AM
> > Subject: Dlsw load-balancing
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I've been trying to do load-balancing on dlsw
for
> > the
> > > past 3 hrs - no luck. Here is my scenario:
> > >
> > > dspu(host)----R1---|--- |----R2--|--dspu(pu1)
> > > |DLSW| |
> > > |----|---R3---|--dspu(pu2)
> > >
> > > R1 has DLSw peering with R2 & R3
> > > R2, R3, PUs share the same LAN
> > > dspu(host) initiates 2 circuits to pu1 & pu2
> > >
> > > Task: Loadbalance such that DLSW circuits are
> > > established between R1-R2 & R1-R3.
> > >
> > > on R1, I configured 'dlsw load-balance
> > round-robin'. I
> > > even tried 'dlsw explorer-delay-time 3'...
invain.
> > >
> > > Initially, the 1st circuit is comes up over R2
and
> > the
> > > 2nd circuit goes to 'CKT_ESTABLISHED' state over
> > R3.
> > > After 1 minute, the 2nd circuit is torn down.
> > After 1
> > > more minute, a new ckt is formed over R2.
> > Ultimately,
> > > both the ckts are formed over R2.
> > >
> > > Am I missing something? Are there any timers
I've
> > to
> > > be aware of? Please let me know. Thanks in
> > advance.
> > >
> > > -Ted.
> > >
> > > ps:
> > >
> > > The network between R1,R2,R3 is as follows-
> > > R1---serial-----R2-----Frame----R3
> > >
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:10 GMT-3