From: Aamer Kaleem (kaleemaamer@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 09:27:59 GMT-3
Check this link from CCO, i guess you need to use
WEIGHT parameter:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_c/b
cprt2/bcddlsw.htm#xtocid1133249
Thanx,
ak
--- Nigel Taylor <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Ted,
> Have you looked("show dlsw capabilities" on
> R1) at the cost of each
> peer from R1-R2 and R1-R3.
> Remember that during the capabilities exchange if
> not specified these peers
> will use the default cost values.
> Try making use of the keyword "cost x" (between 1-5)
> on your R1-R2 and R1-R3
> remote-peer statements.
> Let's see what happens
>
> Nigel
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ted Richmond" <rich_ted@yahoo.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 5:05 AM
> Subject: Dlsw load-balancing
>
>
> > Hi,
> > I've been trying to do load-balancing on dlsw for
> the
> > past 3 hrs - no luck. Here is my scenario:
> >
> > dspu(host)----R1---|--- |----R2--|--dspu(pu1)
> > |DLSW| |
> > |----|---R3---|--dspu(pu2)
> >
> > R1 has DLSw peering with R2 & R3
> > R2, R3, PUs share the same LAN
> > dspu(host) initiates 2 circuits to pu1 & pu2
> >
> > Task: Loadbalance such that DLSW circuits are
> > established between R1-R2 & R1-R3.
> >
> > on R1, I configured 'dlsw load-balance
> round-robin'. I
> > even tried 'dlsw explorer-delay-time 3'... invain.
> >
> > Initially, the 1st circuit is comes up over R2 and
> the
> > 2nd circuit goes to 'CKT_ESTABLISHED' state over
> R3.
> > After 1 minute, the 2nd circuit is torn down.
> After 1
> > more minute, a new ckt is formed over R2.
> Ultimately,
> > both the ckts are formed over R2.
> >
> > Am I missing something? Are there any timers I've
> to
> > be aware of? Please let me know. Thanks in
> advance.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > ps:
> >
> > The network between R1,R2,R3 is as follows-
> > R1---serial-----R2-----Frame----R3
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:09 GMT-3