From: Michael Snyder (msnyder@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 26 2002 - 22:23:16 GMT-3
Anybody ever use this one? I love finding new stuff (new to me). I
don't need any stinking dlsw. Just give me a bridged tunnel interface.
Testing from workstation to workstation, Workstation 192.168.200.100 is
plugged into router b and Workstation 192.168.200.200 is plugged into
router f.
C:\>ping 192.168.200.200
Reply from 192.168.200.200: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.200.200: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.200.200: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.200.200: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 192.168.200.200:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 63ms, Maximum = 141ms, Average = 82ms
C:\>ping 192.168.200.100
Pinging 192.168.200.100 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.200.100: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.200.100: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.200.100: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.200.100: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 192.168.200.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
C:\>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
Router B
bridge crb
bridge 1 protocol ieee
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
!
interface Tunnel0
no ip address
tunnel source Loopback0
tunnel destination 6.6.6.6
bridge-group 1
!
interface Ethernet0
no ip address
bridge-group 1
Router F
bridge crb
bridge 1 protocol ieee
interface Loopback0
ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.0
!
interface Tunnel0
no ip address
tunnel source Loopback0
tunnel destination 2.2.2.2
bridge-group 1
!
interface Ethernet0
no ip address
bridge-group 1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:09 GMT-3