RE: a interest question

From: Tom Young (gitsyoung@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 26 2002 - 22:24:11 GMT-3


   
I thought the problem was on the switch, I shouldn't
connect the Cisco's e0 and e1 port into one switch. Right?
I don't know.

Thanks

Young

 --- Andr$B(&(B Bersvendsen <an-bersv@online.no> $B$+$i$N%a%C(B
$B%;!<%8!'(B
> What about the routing table in the IBM router? Dos
> it have a route to
> 192.168.0.0/24 via the IP address of e0 on the Cisco
> router? Or to the
> IBM routers own interface (So that the Cisco router
> can use proxy ARP)?
>
> Andr(& Bersvendsen
> CCIE #9253
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Tom Young
> Sent: 26. mai 2002 18:29
> To: Michael Snyder
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: a interest question
>
> Sorry, I forgot tell you , The computer's gateway
> setting
> is very well.
> The Cisco's e0 is 192.168.0.254, and the computer's
> gateway was also set by 192.168.0.254
>
> Thanks
>
> Young
>
> --- Michael Snyder <msnyder@ldd.net>
> $+$i$N%a%C%;)`%8#:
> > Did the workstation have a gateway set?
> >
> > Better yet, the ibm router didn't know about the
> > existence of the
> > 192.168.0.0/24 network. No return path, no ping.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Tom Young
> > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 10:27 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: a interest question
> >
> > I very interest question that I had been
> > encountered.
> >
> > A Cisco 3600, e0 port was 192.168.0.0/24 , e1 was
> > 192.156.15.0/24, e0 and e1 are connecting with one
> > switch.
> > A IBM router also connected the switch. Ethernet
> > port of
> > the IBM was 192.156.15.254. One computer was
> > 192.168.0.2
> > that also connect the switch.
> >
> > Question, I could ping IBM's 192.156.15.254 from
> > Cisco
> > router, but couldn't do it from that computer. is
> it
> > right? If it was right, how about the reason.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Young
> >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:09 GMT-3