From: garcia (e_garcia@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 23 2002 - 13:05:50 GMT-3
On the 2-day, I read the exam twice - once to read and another to
strategize/develop a game plan. In retrospect, I should have read it once
(with a game plan in mind) and taken better notes to save time. In any
case, read it until you get it.
You should have a game plan to consider scenario requirements and
dependencies, knowns and unknowns, questions to clarify with the proctor,
etc. along with the time factor that is working against you. You can fine
tune that game plan by reading through the entire exam.
I also recommend to approach your hours upon hours upon hours of practice
labs the same way you plan to approach the real lab every single time so it
is old hat to you. Everything you plan to do in the real lab exam (layered
config approach vs. one subject at a time, note taking, drawings, issue
spotting, timesavers including shortcuts/aliases, ping scripts, praying,
etc.) should become somewhat automatic beforehand imho.
Frank Garcia
----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher E. Miller <chrimill@cisco.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:35 PM
Subject: To all who have sat at least once...
> Is there any real advantage to reading through the entire test first????
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:06 GMT-3