Re: BGP

From: MADMAN (dmadlan@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 23 2002 - 12:48:59 GMT-3


   
  Looks like your looking at the routing table of the router that has
the 172.12.1.0/25 interface, what do you expect to see?????? Look on
your neighbor 172.20.80.32.

  Dave

"SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1)" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have tried using -network 172.16.1.0 mask 255.255.255.128
> network 172.16.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0
>
> Heres the output.
> giggles#sh run
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration:
> !
> version 12.0
> service timestamps debug uptime
> service timestamps log uptime
> no service password-encryption
> !
> hostname giggles
> !
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> !
> !
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 172.16.1.7 255.255.255.128
> no ip directed-broadcast
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> no ip address
> no ip directed-broadcast
> shutdown
> !
> interface Serial0
> ip address 172.16.100.10 255.255.255.252
> no ip directed-broadcast
> !
> interface Serial1
> no ip address
> no ip directed-broadcast
> shutdown
> !
> interface BRI0
> no ip address
> no ip directed-broadcast
> shutdown
> !
> router bgp 300
> no synchronization
> network 172.16.1.7 mask 255.255.255.128
> neighbor 172.16.100.9 remote-as 700
> no auto-summary
> !
> ip classless
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.100.9
> ip route 172.16.1.7 255.255.255.255 Null0
> !
> !
> line con 0
> transport input none
> line aux 0
> line vty 0 4
> !
> end
>
> sh ip ro-
> Gateway of last resort is 172.16.100.9 to network 0.0.0.0
>
> 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
> C 172.16.1.0/25 is directly connected, Loopback0
> C 172.16.100.8/30 is directly connected, Serial0
> S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 172.16.100.9
>
> giggles#sh ip bgp
> giggles#
>
> giggles#sh ip bgp s
> BGP router identifier 172.16.1.7, local AS number 300
> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
>
> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down
> State/PfxRcd
>
> 172.16.100.9 4 700 1842 1855 1 0 0 01:23:09 0
>
> giggles#sh ip bgp neighbors 172.16.100.9 advertised-routes
> giggles#
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erhan Kurt [mailto:kurt@superonline.net]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2002 15:52
> To: SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1); Erhan Kurt; Song Mu; Dang Quang Minh;
> 'Yan-Hui Liang'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: BGP
>
> Keep trying.. You have to use given subnet on loopbacks :)
>
> Send your last sh ru, sh ip rou, sh ip bgp su, sh ip bgp
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1) [mailto:mohit_sharma@hp.com]
> Sent: 23 Mayis 2002 Persembe 16:51
> To: 'Erhan Kurt'; Song Mu; Dang Quang Minh; 'Yan-Hui Liang';
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: BGP
>
> So guys I am back with the same problem.
> I have tried quite a number of combinations of network statements, but it
> either does not advertise anything or just advertises the whole 172.16.0.0
> subnet.
>
> I guess it is then not such a good idea to use a bigger subnet for loopback
> interfaces, so I will use 255.255.255.255 subnet for my loopbacks.
>
> Smiles,
>
> Mohit.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erhan Kurt [mailto:kurt@superonline.net]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2002 15:21
> To: Song Mu; Dang Quang Minh; 'SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1)'; 'Yan-Hui
> Liang'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: BGP
>
> You may not use any static routes unless specifically said.
>
> Cheers,
> Erhan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Song Mu [mailto:songmu@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 23 Mayis 2002 Persembe 15:47
> To: Dang Quang Minh; 'SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1)'; 'Yan-Hui Liang';
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: BGP
>
> I suspect that it because the network you try to advertise is not in your
> routing table. Try use show ip route on the local router. If you can not
> see the network, then add a static route: ip route 172.16.1.7
> 255.255.255.128 null0 use show ip route to verify it appeares on the routing
> table, then you would see it from the remote.
>
> Hope this will solve your problem.
>
> Song
>
> --- Dang Quang Minh <minhdq@saigonctt.com> wrote:
> > Try 'neighbor ebgp-multihop 2'
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1)
> > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:49 PM
> > To: 'Yan-Hui Liang'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: BGP
> >
> > HI All,
> >
> > Thanx for your inputs.
> >
> > I have disbaled both auto summary and synchronisation on the routers.
> > After giving the command network 172.16.1.5 mask 255.255.255.128 I
> > still do not see this advertised.
> >
> > hostname giggles
> > !
> > !
> > ip subnet-zero
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 172.16.1.7 255.255.255.128
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > ip address 172.16.100.10 255.255.255.252
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> >
> > !
> > interface BRI0
> > no ip address
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > shutdown
> > !
> > router bgp 300
> > no synchronization
> > network 172.16.1.4 mask 255.255.255.128
> > neighbor 172.16.100.9 remote-as 700
> > no auto-summary
> > !
> > ip classless
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.100.9
> > !
> > end
> >
> > giggles#sh ip bgp neighbors 172.16.100.9 advertised-routes giggles#
> >
> > Any other suggestions please?
> >
> > Smiles,
> >
> > Mohit.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yan-Hui Liang [mailto:Yan-Hui.Liang@sprint-canada.com]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Mai 2002 19:19
> > To: SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1); ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: BGP
> >
> >
> >
> > Did you disable auto summary under BGP? then use network 172.16.1.5
> > mask 255.255.255.128
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: SHARMA,MOHIT (HP-Germany,ex1) [mailto:mohit_sharma@hp.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:52 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: BGP
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have an issue with BGP.
> >
> > I am using 172.16.1.0/25 subnet for the looopback interfaces on my lab
> > routers.
> >
> > I have a router in an AS with the loopback interface ip 172.16.1.5
> >
> > Is it possible that I can advertise only this IP to other external
> > AS's.
> >
> > I have tried this but somehow it always advertises some weird subnet.
> >
> > Can you use such a big subnet for loopbacks?
> >
> >
> > Smiles,
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:06 GMT-3