Re: Is it possible to DLSW peer in this setup?

From: elpingu (elping@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 22 2002 - 00:05:58 GMT-3

• Next message: David Ham: "IP prefix-list default-route."
• Previous message: Ng, Kim Seng David (David): "RE: Two B-channels used for standard pinging"
• Maybe in reply to: Jeongwoo Park: "Is it possible to DLSW peer in this setup?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
if notice at the beggining when you do
a sh dlsw peer it is an llc peer
try a map statement
fram map llc dlci

Jeongwoo Park wrote:

> Hi all.
> Now I am facing another dlsw peer problem.
> I have a hub router A that is supposed to be configured with subinterface
> (point to point).
> At the other end of the frame relay, I have a spoke router B that is not
> supposed to be configured with subinterface.
> And I am asked to configure dlsw peer not using tcp or fst encapsulation.
> With this set up, I tried direct encap with or without pass-thru numerous
> times. I couldn't get dlsw peer "connect"
> Is this possible scenario? Or silly scenario?
>
> Thanks in adv.
>
> JP

• Next message: David Ham: "IP prefix-list default-route."
• Previous message: Ng, Kim Seng David (David): "RE: Two B-channels used for standard pinging"
• Maybe in reply to: Jeongwoo Park: "Is it possible to DLSW peer in this setup?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:04 GMT-3