From: Roberts, Larry (Larry.Roberts@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 21 2002 - 18:34:50 GMT-3
Can you post your ospf database for these routes?
Thanks
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Larson [mailto:clarson52@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Muddasar Ahmed; Larson, Chris (Contractor); ccielab@groupstudy.com;
Larry.Roberts@expanets.com
Subject: Re: Multiple OSPF Default info distribute
I have max-paths set on all routers involved. The routes should show as
equal cost everywhere as I set the metric to 10 and type to 2 when issuing
the default info command. As for the CEF suggestion posted earlier, I
believe you need to get the routes into the routing table before they will
be moved into CEF's fib database. Yes they both show up as type 5 in ospf
database. i will keep working on it until I get something definitive. I do
not nderstand why it isn't working.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Muddasar Ahmed" <muddasar_ahmed@yahoo.com>
To: "Larson, Chris (Contractor)" <Chris.Larson@ed.gov>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple OSPF Default info distribute
> Chris,
> By default OSPF selects the best Path. Without going
> into Best Path selection criteria I give you the
> answer.
>
> Use the maximum-paths command under OSPF (remnote or recieving
> routers) to allow more than one path to the routing table. OSPF allows
> only equal cost load balancing. So your type to metric selection is
> right the choice in this scenrio.
>
> regards,
> Muddasar
>
>
> --- "Larson, Chris (Contractor)" <Chris.Larson@ed.gov>
> wrote:
> > I posted this on Thursday or Friday and have not
> > gotten any response (which
> > is surprising). So I am posting again in hopes
> > someone can shed some light.
> >
> >
> > What I would like to do is this:
> > We have 2 hub locations where we are provided
> > Internet service. These hub
> > locations are equal distance for all the remote
> > ends. I am trying to put a
> > default information originate into OSPF at both hub
> > sites so I can get both
> > equal costs 0/0 routes on all remote routers
> > pointing to both hub locations
> > so traffic will be per destination load balanced to
> > the sites.
> >
> > Both sites are equal costs to remotes, and the
> > default info originate is
> > being done as metric-type 2. Both 0/0 routes show up
> > as type 5 in ospf
> > database, but only one shows up in route table.
> > Shouldn't there be 2 0/0
> > routes in the table? Do you know why there isn't?
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:04 GMT-3