From: Muddasar Ahmed (muddasar_ahmed@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 23 2002 - 16:36:02 GMT-3
Chris,
It s max-paths 2, correct?
Muddasar
--- Chris Larson <clarson52@comcast.net> wrote:
> I have max-paths set on all routers involved. The
> routes should show as
> equal cost everywhere as I set the metric to 10 and
> type to 2 when issuing
> the default info command. As for the CEF suggestion
> posted earlier, I
> believe you need to get the routes into the routing
> table before they will
> be moved into CEF's fib database. Yes they both show
> up as type 5 in ospf
> database. i will keep working on it until I get
> something definitive. I do
> not nderstand why it isn't working.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Muddasar Ahmed" <muddasar_ahmed@yahoo.com>
> To: "Larson, Chris (Contractor)"
> <Chris.Larson@ed.gov>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Multiple OSPF Default info distribute
>
>
> > Chris,
> > By default OSPF selects the best Path. Without
> going
> > into Best Path selection criteria I give you the
> > answer.
> >
> > Use the maximum-paths command under OSPF (remnote
> or
> > recieving routers) to allow more than one path to
> the
> > routing table. OSPF allows only equal cost load
> > balancing. So your type to metric selection is
> right
> > the choice in this scenrio.
> >
> > regards,
> > Muddasar
> >
> >
> > --- "Larson, Chris (Contractor)"
> <Chris.Larson@ed.gov>
> > wrote:
> > > I posted this on Thursday or Friday and have not
> > > gotten any response (which
> > > is surprising). So I am posting again in hopes
> > > someone can shed some light.
> > >
> > >
> > > What I would like to do is this:
> > > We have 2 hub locations where we are provided
> > > Internet service. These hub
> > > locations are equal distance for all the remote
> > > ends. I am trying to put a
> > > default information originate into OSPF at both
> hub
> > > sites so I can get both
> > > equal costs 0/0 routes on all remote routers
> > > pointing to both hub locations
> > > so traffic will be per destination load balanced
> to
> > > the sites.
> > >
> > > Both sites are equal costs to remotes, and the
> > > default info originate is
> > > being done as metric-type 2. Both 0/0 routes
> show up
> > > as type 5 in ospf
> > > database, but only one shows up in route table.
> > > Shouldn't there be 2 0/0
> > > routes in the table? Do you know why there
> isn't?
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:07 GMT-3