From: Nigel Taylor (nigel_taylor@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 20 2002 - 19:49:06 GMT-3
Might I suggest looking at the ospf database using the "show ip ospf ext"
command. Check the fowarding metric of the route in question. I'm
willing to bet that one of the outgoing interfaces (from where the default
route originates) has a higher metric than the other.
HTH
Nigel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larson, Chris (Contractor)" <Chris.Larson@ed.gov>
To: "'Roberts, Larry'" <Larry.Roberts@expanets.com>; "'David Luu'"
<wicked01@ix.netcom.com>; "Larson, Chris (Contractor)"
<Chris.Larson@ed.gov>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 3:46 PM
Subject: RE: Multiple OSPF Default info distribute
> The backbone between hub sites? It is ATM over SONET. The connections to
the
> Remotes are ATM. There is a PVC in the ATM cloud to each hub.
> I have already tried setting max paths. It seems to me that from the
e-mail
> I am getting this should be working.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:Larry.Roberts@expanets.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 3:21 PM
> To: 'David Luu'; Larson, Chris (Contractor); 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: RE: Multiple OSPF Default info distribute
>
>
> What is your Provider backbone? Is it a Layer 2 or a layer 3 ?
>
> I believe that you need to put a maximum-paths 2 statement under OSPF so
> that it will show up.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Larry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Luu [mailto:wicked01@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 2:04 PM
> To: Larson, Chris (Contractor); 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Re: Multiple OSPF Default info distribute
>
>
> could you draw a little ascii diagram on how its setup?
>
> At 08:06 AM 5/20/2002 -0400, Larson, Chris (Contractor) wrote:
> >I posted this on Thursday or Friday and have not gotten any response
> >(which is surprising). So I am posting again in hopes someone can shed
> >some light.
> >
> >
> >What I would like to do is this:
> >We have 2 hub locations where we are provided Internet service. These
> >hub locations are equal distance for all the remote ends. I am trying
> >to put a default information originate into OSPF at both hub sites so I
> >can get both equal costs 0/0 routes on all remote routers pointing to
> >both hub locations so traffic will be per destination load balanced to
> >the sites.
> >
> >Both sites are equal costs to remotes, and the default info originate
> >is being done as metric-type 2. Both 0/0 routes show up as type 5 in
> >ospf database, but only one shows up in route table. Shouldn't there be
> >2 0/0 routes in the table? Do you know why there isn't?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:03 GMT-3